Beginning January 1, 2009, FHA will insure single-family home mortgages up to $271,050 in low cost areas and up to a maximum of $625,500 in high cost areas. The February 2008 Stimulus Package temporarily raised the FHA maximum to $729,750 through December 31, 2008. The new $625,500 maximum, however, represents a significant increase over the $362,790 limit that was in effect prior to the Stimulus Package.
"In today's environment where access to credit is being restricted, we need to make mortgage loans readily available to households throughout the country, and especially in high-cost areas," said Preston. "These new loan limits will ensure FHA can to continue help struggling homeowners refinance into safe, affordable government-insured loans, and allow many first-time buyers take advantage of today's buyers market"
For several years, FHA's loan levels were below the cost of the average home in communities across the nation. As a result, families who needed FHA mortgage insurance to qualify to buy a home were effectively locked out of the process. In some cases, borrowers turned to exotic subprime loans.
FHA mortgage insurance makes home financing more available to low-income and first time homebuyers. This is because the mortgage is backed by the full faith and credit of the government, freeing lenders from assuming the risk of default.
Higher FHA loan limits do not cost the government any money because the FHA Insurance Fund is fully supported by premiums paid by borrowers who receive FHA-insured mortgage loans.
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act pegs the national conforming mortgage loan limit to a house price index chosen by the new Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). For 2009, the national conforming limit will remain at the current level of $417,000.
The Act says that the new FHA loan limits will be set at 115 percent of the median house price in a given area, as determined by HUD, but can not be lower than 65 percent of the conforming loan limit (the national floor). Also, the FHA mortgage limit cannot exceed 150 percent of the national conforming loan limit (the national ceiling).
Home Equity Conversion Mortgages
The Act also pegs the national mortgage limit for FHA-insured reverse mortgages to the national conforming loan limit. The FHA product known as the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) will therefore have a national mortgage limit of $417,000. Unlike the new forward mortgage loan limits, the new HECM loans limits are effective on loans insured or after November 6, 2008. This is the first time that a single limit applies to these mortgages nationwide. As in previous years, the special exception areas of Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and the Virgin Islands may have higher loan limits. Starting in January 2009 counties in those areas may have loan limits of 115 percent of area median prices, where that amount is above $417,000, up to a ceiling of $625,500.
Reverse mortgages allow homeowners age 62 and older to borrow against the value of their homes without selling them. Homeowners can select a lump-sum payment, monthly payments or tap into a line of credit. No repayment is required as long as a homeowner lives in a home with a reverse mortgage. The reverse mortgage is repaid, with interest, when a homeowner sells the home or dies.
HUD will inform mortgage lenders and brokers of the new limits through a mortgagee letter posted on www.hud.gov and www.fha.gov.
HUD is making available comprehensive listings of the new loan limits in all counties throughout country. Downloadable files are available for FHA Forward Loans, FHA HECM loans, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchases on the HUD website. The limits are determined by the county in which the property is located, except that for properties located in metropolitan statistical areas the limit is determined by the county with the highest median home price within the metropolitan area.
HUD is the nation's housing agency committed to increasing homeownership, particularly among minorities; creating affordable housing opportunities for low-income Americans; and supporting the homeless, elderly, people with disabilities and people living with AIDS. The Department also promotes economic and community development, and enforces the nation's fair housing laws. More information about HUD and its programs is available on the Internet at www.hud.gov and espanol.hud.gov.
Per the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the Federal Housing Administration can only accept appraisers that are certified by a state or a nationally recognized organization. Appraisers must also demonstrate verifiable education in appraisal requirements as established by FHA.
Brian J. Davis, RAA is FHA Approved - Learn more
See our FHA Newsletter
The Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) has issued their September 2008 USPAP Q&A - Download Sept_2008_USPAP_QA.pdf
Sales History for New Construction - I have received an assignment to appraise a property with newly constructed improvements. Because the property includes new construction, there is no prior sales history of the property as it now exists. However, I do have information pertaining to a prior sale of the site (without the improvements). Does Standards Rule 1-5(b) require me to analyze this prior sale of the site?
Appraiser Coercion - Does USPAP require an appraiser to certify in the appraisal report that he or she has not been coerced to provide predetermined results?
Confidentiality and Review Appraisers - A few weeks ago I performed an appraisal for a lender client. I was recently contacted by an individual who claims that she is a review appraiser that has been hired by the lender, and wanted to ask me some questions about my appraisal. Can I discuss my appraisal with her?
Copy of License in Appraisal Report - I have several clients that request I include a copy of my state appraisal license in each appraisal report I perform. Does USPAP permit me to do this?
Click here for the answers! Download Sept_2008_USPAP_QA.pdf
Washington, DC – FHFA Director James B. Lockhart today announced the appointments of new non-executive chairmen of the Boards of Directors of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. John A. Koskinen has agreed to serve as the non-executive chairman of Freddie Mac. Philip A. Laskawy will serve as the non-executive chairman of Fannie Mae. FHFA directed new boards to be formed for both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure solid leadership and good corporate governance.
“Both men bring distinguished experience to their new roles, and I thank them for their public service during this difficult period,” said FHFA Director James B. Lockhart. “Good corporate governance at the Enterprises is especially important right now, and I appreciate the willingness of both of these men to provide Board leadership during these challenging times.”
Click here to continue reading . .
September 7, 2008 STATEMENT OF FHFA DIRECTOR JAMES B. LOCKHART
Good Morning Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac share the critical mission of providing stability and liquidity to the housing market. Between them, the Enterprises have $5.4 trillion of guaranteed mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and debt outstanding, which is equal to the publicly held debt of the United States.
Their market share of all new mortgages reached over 80 percent earlier this year, but it is now falling. During the turmoil last year, they played a very important role in providing liquidity to the conforming mortgage market. That has required a very careful and delicate balance of mission and safety and soundness.
A key component of this balance has been their ability to raise and maintain capital. Given recent market conditions, the 1 balance has been lost. Unfortunately, as house prices, earnings and capital have continued to deteriorate, their ability to fulfill their mission has deteriorated. In particular, the capacity of their capital to absorb further losses while supporting new business activity is in doubt.
Today’s action addresses safety and soundness concerns. FHFA’s rating system is called GSE Enterprise Risk or G-Seer. It stands for Governance, Solvency, Earnings and Enterprise Risk which includes credit, market and operational risk. There are pervasive weaknesses across the board, which have been getting worse in this market.
Over the last three years OFHEO, and now FHFA, have worked hard to encourage the Enterprises to rectify their accounting, systems, controls and risk management issues. They have made good progress in many areas, but market conditions have overwhelmed that progress.
The result has been that they have been unable to provide needed stability to the market. They also find themselves unable to meet their affordable housing mission. Rather than letting these conditions fester and worsen and put our markets in jeopardy, FHFA, after painstaking review, has decided to take action now. Click here for more information.
2 Key events over the past six months have demonstrated the increasing challenge faced by the companies in striving to balance mission and safety and soundness, and the ultimate disruption of that balance that led to today’s announcements. In the first few months of this year, the secondary market showed significant deterioration, with buyers demanding much higher prices for mortgage backed securities.
Click here to continue reading . . .
In February, in recognition of the remediation progress in financial reporting, we removed the portfolio caps on each company, but they did not have the capital to use that flexibility. In March, we announced with the Enterprises an initiative to increase mortgage market liquidity and market confidence. We reduced the OFHEO-directed capital requirements in return for their commitments to raise significant capital and to maintain overall capital levels well in excess of requirements. In April, we released our Annual Report to Congress, identifying each company as a significant supervisory concern and noting, in particular, the deteriorating mortgage credit environment and the risks it posed to the companies. In May OFHEO lifted its 2006 Consent Order with Fannie Mae after the company completed the terms of that order. Subsequently, Fannie Mae successfully raised $7.4 billion of new capital, but Freddie Mac never completed the capital raise promised in March.
In February, in recognition of the remediation progress in financial reporting, we removed the portfolio caps on each company, but they did not have the capital to use that flexibility.
In March, we announced with the Enterprises an initiative to increase mortgage market liquidity and market confidence. We reduced the OFHEO-directed capital requirements in return for their commitments to raise significant capital and to maintain overall capital levels well in excess of requirements.
In April, we released our Annual Report to Congress, identifying each company as a significant supervisory concern and noting, in particular, the deteriorating mortgage credit environment and the risks it posed to the companies.
In May OFHEO lifted its 2006 Consent Order with Fannie Mae after the company completed the terms of that order. Subsequently, Fannie Mae successfully raised $7.4 billion of new capital, but Freddie Mac never completed the capital raise promised in March.
Since then credit conditions in the mortgage market continued to deteriorate, with home prices continuing to decline and mortgage delinquency rates reaching alarming levels. FHFA intensified its reviews of each company’s capital planning and capital position, their earnings forecasts and the effect of falling house prices and increasing delinquencies on the credit quality of their mortgage book.
In getting to today, the supervision team has spent countless hours reviewing with each company various forecasts, stress tests, and projections, and has evaluated the performance of their internal models in these analyses. We have had many meetings with each company’s management teams, and have had frank exchanges regarding loss projections, asset valuations, and capital adequacy. More recently, we have gone the extra step of inviting the Federal Reserve and the OCC to have some of their senior mortgage credit experts join our team in these assessments.
The conclusions we reach today, while our own, have had the added benefit of their insight and perspective.
After this exhaustive review, I have determined that the companies cannot continue to operate safely and soundly and fulfill their critical public mission, without significant action to address our concerns, which are:
Therefore, in order to restore the balance between safety and soundness and mission, FHFA has placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship. That is a statutory process designed to stabilize a troubled institution with the 5 objective of returning the entities to normal business operations. FHFA will act as the conservator to operate the Enterprises until they are stabilized.
The Boards of both companies consented yesterday to the conservatorship. I appreciate the cooperation we have received from the boards and the management of both Enterprises. These individuals did not create the inherent conflict and flawed business model embedded in the Enterprises’ structure.
The goal of these actions is to help restore confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, enhance their capacity to fulfill their mission, and mitigate the systemic risk that has contributed directly to the instability in the current market. The lack of confidence has resulted in continuing spread widening of their MBS, which means that virtually none of the large drop in interest rates over the past year has been passed on to the mortgage markets. On top of that, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, in order to try to build capital, have continued to raise prices and tighten credit standards.
FHFA has not undertaken this action lightly. We have consulted with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Ben Bernanke, who was appointed a consultant to FHFA under the new legislation. We 6 have also consulted with the Secretary of the Treasury, not only as an FHFA Oversight Board member, but also in his duties under the law to provide financing to the GSEs. They both concurred with me that conservatorship needed to be undertaken now.
There are several key components of this conservatorship:
One of the three facilities he will be mentioning is a secured liquidity facility which will be not only for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but also for the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks that FHFA also regulates. The Federal Home Loan Banks have performed remarkably well over the last year as they have a different business model than Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a different capital structure that grows as their lending activity grows. They are joint and severally liable for the Bank System’s debt obligations and all but one of the 12 are profitable. Therefore, it is very unlikely that they will use the facility.
During the conservatorship period, FHFA will continue to work expeditiously on the many regulations needed to implement the new law. Some of the key regulations will be minimum capital standards, prudential safety and soundness standards and portfolio limits. It is critical to complete these regulations so that any new investor will understand the investment proposition.
This decision was a tough one for the FHFA team as they have worked so hard to help the Enterprises remain strong suppliers of support to the secondary mortgage markets. Unfortunately, the antiquated capital requirements and the turmoil in housing markets over-whelmed all the good and hard work put in by the FHFA teams and the Enterprises’ managers and employees.
Conservatorship will give the Enterprises the time to restore the balances between safety and soundness and provide affordable housing and stability and liquidity to the mortgage markets.
I want to thank the FHFA employees for their work during this intense regulatory process. They represent the best in public service. I would also like to thank the employees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for all their hard work. Working together we can finish the job of restoring confidence in the Enterprises and with the new legislation build a stronger and safer future for the mortgage markets, homeowners and renters in America.
Thank you and I will now turn it back to Secretary Paulson.
Source Document: Click here
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON CONSERVATORSHIP
According to the IAR July sales report, home sales were down 5.76 percent in July 2008 to 11,021 sales compared to June 2008 sales of 11,694; year-over-year sales were down 25.2 percent from July 2007 totals of 14,738.
The Illinois median price in July was $199,900, down 4.8 percent from $210,000 in July 2007.
“While most housing-related indicators reveal continued problems, there is some increasing evidence the supply and demand may be moving more into balance, especially in many metropolitan markets in Illinois,” said Dr. Geoff Hewings, director of U of I's Regional Economics Applications Laboratory (from the August 2008 forecast pdf).
"Four national associations of real estate appraisers have asked Congress* for major regulatory reforms in the wake of an Associated Press investigation that identified key failings within the existing system."
*Thanks to Scott Austin, Austin Appraisal, LLC, I now have a copy of the letter sent by the AI, ASA, NAIFA, and ASFMRA Download AI_ASA_ASFMRA_NAIFA_Response_Letter_AP.pdf
*Thanks to Scott Austin, Austin Appraisal, LLC, I now have a copy of the letter sent by the AI, ASA, NAIFA, and ASFMRA
Download AI_ASA_ASFMRA_NAIFA_Response_Letter_AP.pdf
Naturally . . .the organizations suggest that the use of designated appraisers from a nationally recognized professional appraisal organization " . . .would help mitigate concerns about appraiser involvement in mortgage fraud.
But they go on to specifically address Title XI which, " . . . has several structural deficiencies that we previously identified, which are highlighted in the Associated Press article, as follows: "
Webcast Author: David A. Braun, MAI, SRA (President, Braun & Associates, Inc.) has been actively engaged in real estate appraisal, review, and consulting since 1976. David is also the author of Appraising in the New Millennium - Due Diligence & Scope of Work, 3rd Ed.
David Braun, MAI, SRA has been working with the a la mode, inc.'s Labs Project on the development of a new Market Conditions Analysis (MCA) form that runs in Excel.
This webcast is the third in a three-part series that will be discussing:
In this third webcast David talks about what defines a "Market Bubble" in his down-home Tennessee style. Here's an excerpt:
"Now the best way that I can describe what happens is by telling you a story about when I was young. We used to have these little balsa wood gliders that we would throw. And, you could set the wings up and back. And, depending on how you set the wings on those, they could go up . . .or they could go down.""Occasionally, we'd set the wings so far to one side that when we threw it, it would go up, and then it would stall . . . and down it would come! ""So that's what I think about. As soon as the activity slows down. . . as soon as that "plane" that's going up slows down, the nose goes up and BOOM! Right down on its tail! An that's what a lot of "Investors" have done now."
"Now the best way that I can describe what happens is by telling you a story about when I was young. We used to have these little balsa wood gliders that we would throw. And, you could set the wings up and back. And, depending on how you set the wings on those, they could go up . . .or they could go down."
"Occasionally, we'd set the wings so far to one side that when we threw it, it would go up, and then it would stall . . . and down it would come! "
"So that's what I think about. As soon as the activity slows down. . . as soon as that "plane" that's going up slows down, the nose goes up and BOOM! Right down on its tail! An that's what a lot of "Investors" have done now."
© Brian J. Davis & Associates - GLB Privacy Statement
Brian J. Davis / OurAppraisal.com Privacy Policy Statement
Copyright © 2008 Brian J. Davis and AssociatesPortions Copyright © 2008 a la mode, inc.Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Terms of Use| Site Map